Difference between revisions of "User:John Burt"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The goal of this project is to develop and promote a UAV platform for biological research, conservation work, and wildlife management. The UAV system I am building is intended to be cheap, relatively easy to use, easy to maintain, flexible, and hackable for different missions. The system is ultimately intended to be used in extremely difficult and remote field environments where there is no internet or reliable power source (e.g., African bush, South America, South Pacific, US Pacific Northwest wilderness). | The goal of this project is to develop and promote a UAV platform for biological research, conservation work, and wildlife management. The UAV system I am building is intended to be cheap, relatively easy to use, easy to maintain, flexible, and hackable for different missions. The system is ultimately intended to be used in extremely difficult and remote field environments where there is no internet or reliable power source (e.g., African bush, South America, South Pacific, US Pacific Northwest wilderness). | ||
== | == Airframes == | ||
I am currently exploring two Multiplex products: | I am currently exploring two Multiplex products: | ||
---- | |||
=== Easystar: === | === Easystar: === | ||
---- | |||
'''Advantages:''' | '''Advantages:''' | ||
| Line 38: | Line 40: | ||
* Airframe tested and flying. | * Airframe tested and flying. | ||
---- | |||
=== Cularis: === | === Cularis: === | ||
---- | |||
'''Advantages:''' | '''Advantages:''' | ||
* Very efficient flight, good penetration. | |||
* Rugged elapor foam, which I reinforce with strapping tape to increase rigidity. | |||
* Lots of room in fuselage, and foam allows easy modification. | |||
* Cheap, easy to assemble kit (more expensive and difficult to assemble than Easystar). | |||
* All parts are replaceable with little or no assembly. | |||
* Larger payload capacity and potential range than Easystar. | |||
'''Modifications:''' | '''Modifications:''' | ||
* Strapping tape reinforcement on fuse and wings to ruggedize the airframe. | |||
* Hacked canopy, allowing avionics to be stowed in canopy. | |||
'''Progress:''' | '''Progress:''' | ||
* Airframe tested and flying. | |||
Revision as of 23:37, 22 February 2009
About me
I am a Research Scientist who studies songbird behavior at the University of Washington. I am also a hardware tinkerer and software developer.
Current Project: COTS UAV System for Biological Research
Field biologists, conservationists, and wildlife management agencies have many potential applications for small UAV systems. However, UAVs aren't frequently used in htese areas because 1) they are perceived to be too expensive, difficult, or complex, and/or 2) people are not simply aware of the potential uses of UAVs in their field.
The goal of this project is to develop and promote a UAV platform for biological research, conservation work, and wildlife management. The UAV system I am building is intended to be cheap, relatively easy to use, easy to maintain, flexible, and hackable for different missions. The system is ultimately intended to be used in extremely difficult and remote field environments where there is no internet or reliable power source (e.g., African bush, South America, South Pacific, US Pacific Northwest wilderness).
Airframes
I am currently exploring two Multiplex products:
Easystar:
Advantages:
- Extremely stable flight characteristics, yet reasonably efficient.
- Rugged elapor foam, which I reinforce with strapping tape to increase rigidity.
- Pylon pusher configuration reduces motor/prop damage from hard landings.
- Lots of room in fuselage, and foam allows easy modification.
- Cheap, easy to assemble kit.
- All parts are replaceable with little or no assembly.
- If assembled properly, can be broken down to small size for transport.
- Minor changes to stock construction allowing further breakdown for transport.
Modifications:
- Brushless motor with folding propellor.
- Hacked canopy, allowing avionics to be stowed in canopy.
- Modification mid fuselage to mount high rez digital camera for aerial imaging.
- Strapping tape reinforcement on fuse and wings to ruggedize the airframe.
- Aileron mod for Paparazzi autopilot testing.
- Minor changes to stock construction allowing further breakdown for transport.
Progress:
- Airframe tested and flying.
Cularis:
Advantages:
- Very efficient flight, good penetration.
- Rugged elapor foam, which I reinforce with strapping tape to increase rigidity.
- Lots of room in fuselage, and foam allows easy modification.
- Cheap, easy to assemble kit (more expensive and difficult to assemble than Easystar).
- All parts are replaceable with little or no assembly.
- Larger payload capacity and potential range than Easystar.
Modifications:
- Strapping tape reinforcement on fuse and wings to ruggedize the airframe.
- Hacked canopy, allowing avionics to be stowed in canopy.
Progress:
- Airframe tested and flying.