Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lisa Gumstix Breakout"

From PaparazziUAV
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:


=== I2C ===
=== I2C ===
Should we have I2C level shifters or anything on the breakout board? [[User:Esden|Esden]] 21:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
* Should we have I2C level shifters or anything on the breakout board? [[User:Esden|Esden]] 21:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed that it is needed. No isolation for I2C but levelshifting to 5V or 3.3V [[User:Esden|Esden]] 01:15, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
* Confirmed that it is needed. No isolation for I2C but levelshifting to 5V or 3.3V [[User:Esden|Esden]] 01:15, 23 August 2012 (UTC)


=== Minimum requirements ===
=== Minimum requirements ===
What is the minimal list of IO and power needed on the board? [[User:Esden|Esden]] 21:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
What is the minimal list of IO and power needed on the board? [[User:Esden|Esden]] 21:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:16, 22 August 2012

Autopilot Discussion

Maybe use Lia instead of Lisa/M. Lia has the same circuitry as lisa/m (apart from the BMP barometer). Then we could use the 0.1" header pins to do board to board connections between lia and the Lisa Gumstix Breakout (LGB). Esden 21:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

IO Discussion

I2C

  • Should we have I2C level shifters or anything on the breakout board? Esden 21:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Confirmed that it is needed. No isolation for I2C but levelshifting to 5V or 3.3V Esden 01:15, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Minimum requirements

What is the minimal list of IO and power needed on the board? Esden 21:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)