Difference between revisions of "Talk:User/AirborneCodeReorg"

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-IMHO not really compelling reasons for such a drastical change. Better to take a look at other projects first and how they reorganized e.g. http://pixhawk.ethz.ch [OpenUAS]
-NOTE: IMHO now compiling the AC from commandline becomes more cumbersome. The makefile can already be in an Include  in the XML. Do not forget it was designed this way for a reason ;). A dynamic makefile is OK by me but make sure the old methods do not break. Code refactoring is better first done by cleaning up odl thing, not redesigning first. [OpenUAS]
-: I don't quite understand what you mean. Compiling stays exactly the same, just your airframe file changes. In order to refactor the code we need something like this (subsystem makefiles) otherwise when we refactor all airframes will break. [flixr]

Latest revision as of 14:34, 24 August 2010