Difference between revisions of "User:John Burt"

From PaparazziUAV
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
== About me ==
== About me ==


I am a University of Washington Research Scientist who studies bioacoustics and animal behavior. I also design and build hardware and develop software for use in various scientific research projects. Besides science, my other passion is RC model aircraft, particularly gliders and electrics. My work Paparazzi project is an attempt to combine my work with my hobby.
I am a University of Washington Research Scientist who studies bioacoustics and animal behavior. I also design and build hardware and develop software for use in various scientific research projects. Besides science, my other passion is RC model aircraft, particularly gliders and electrics. My Paparazzi project is an attempt to combine my work with my hobby.


I currently live in Portland.
I currently live in Portland.

Revision as of 11:48, 4 March 2009

About me

I am a University of Washington Research Scientist who studies bioacoustics and animal behavior. I also design and build hardware and develop software for use in various scientific research projects. Besides science, my other passion is RC model aircraft, particularly gliders and electrics. My Paparazzi project is an attempt to combine my work with my hobby.

I currently live in Portland.

Current Project: COTS UAV System for Biological Research

Field biologists, conservationists, and wildlife management agencies have many potential applications for small UAV systems. However, UAVs aren't frequently used in these areas because 1) they are perceived to be too expensive, difficult, or complex, and/or 2) people are simply not aware of the potential uses of UAVs in their field.

The goal of this project is to develop and promote a UAV platform for biological research, conservation work, and wildlife management. The UAV system I am building is intended to be extremely rugged, cheap, relatively easy to use and maintain, flexible, and hackable for different missions. The system is ultimately intended to be used in extremely difficult and remote field environments where there is no internet or reliable power source (e.g., African bush, South America, South Pacific, US Pacific Northwest wilderness).

Airframes

I am currently exploring two Multiplex products:


Easystar:


Advantages:

  • Extremely stable flight characteristics, yet reasonably efficient.
  • Rugged elapor foam, which I reinforce with strapping tape to increase rigidity.
  • Pylon pusher configuration reduces motor/prop damage from hard landings.
  • Lots of room in fuselage, and foam allows easy modification.
  • Cheap, easy to assemble kit.
  • All parts are replaceable with little or no assembly.
  • If assembled properly, can be broken down to small size for transport.
  • Minor changes to stock construction allowing further breakdown for transport.


Modifications:

  • Brushless motor with folding propellor.
  • Hacked canopy, allowing avionics to be stowed in canopy.
  • Modification mid fuselage to mount high rez digital camera for aerial imaging.
  • Strapping tape reinforcement on fuse and wings to ruggedize the airframe.
  • Aileron mod for Paparazzi autopilot testing.
  • Minor changes to stock construction allowing further breakdown for transport.

Progress:

  • Airframe tested and flying.



Cularis:


Advantages:

  • Very efficient flight, good penetration.
  • Rugged elapor foam, which I reinforce with strapping tape to increase rigidity.
  • Lots of room in fuselage, and foam allows easy modification.
  • Cheap, easy to assemble kit (more expensive and difficult to assemble than Easystar).
  • All parts are replaceable with little or no assembly.
  • Larger payload capacity and potential range than Easystar.

Modifications:

  • Strapping tape reinforcement on fuse and wings to ruggedize the airframe.
  • Hacked canopy, allowing avionics to be stowed in canopy.

Progress:

  • Airframe tested and flying.